If I were tasked to teach a new online course, I would start by determining my target group. I would consider all of the information that I had available pertaining to my students and plan my approach accordingly. If I did not have much to go by, I would formulate a fairly extensive assessment and present it to my students in the first week. The data that I would hope to obtain includes: cognitive abilities, personal backgrounds, career paths/career goals, attitudes and interests, experience with the technologies that could be utilized and what their expectations are for the course.
If it were a small group of students, I would opt to use more individualized instruction designed to promote communication between students and the instructor. In event of a larger group, I would divide the class into subgroups for better manageability of class discussions and group projects. Next I would look at the level of comprehension in the subject matter being taught. If I had a broad range, I would assign more group projects and match the more advanced students up with those who were the least knowledgeable. If the assessment showed a high level of understanding, then I would go into more detail within particular areas of the content and increase the pace that the topics were covered within each module. If the results showed a low overall level of understanding, my focus would be more on the basic concepts; instruction would be delivered at a slower pace and would be more generalized. The information derived from the personal interests and career goals assessment would help establish discussion topics and projects.
I would already have the basic skeleton of my course established based on the key principles of the content and the goals that I have for the students. I would adopt a variation of the learner-directed design approach. Students would be granted the freedom to choose between several options within modules, however I would keep the content linear. Requirements would be placed on student feedback, due dates and participation. Goals would be assigned to each module and students would be tested at the conclusion of each module to assess the module’s effectiveness. Lesson plans would be broken up into sections containing various resources/information supporting the content as well as student goals. I would make a conscious effort not to rely too much on technology, but would integrate a balanced mix of technological resources. For each media used to convey the content, I would have an alternate means of achieving the instructional goals in place.
In summary, I would first focus on addressing Foley’s basic principles of good instructional design based on the target audience, the content or subject matter and the desired outcomes. I would be sure to provide clear guidelines to my students and do my best to facilitate meaningful collaboration. Optional assignments would be available based on students’ feedback and the desired outcomes for the course. Goals would be set from module to module and constant feedback would be gathered and the information resulting from formative evaluations would serve as the basis for the development of future lessons.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

hi my friend
ReplyDeletei like your beginning that you will focus on your student level of skills and suppurate them in grope if they are big groub. but what level are you going to teach?
how your program will be useful for them?
thank you
amal
Hi Nate, Good job putting the task of learning about your students first! I should have thought of that! I'll need to assess experience and skills with accessing technology. I will know that all my students have a BA, passed the CSET and want to be teachers. I also like your idea about allowing students choices within the modules about how they'll access the content - but choices are a lot of work! I hope to achieve this but might have to start with just one choice. I'm looking forward to sharing what I'm doing with the on-line courses this summer and getting some help with good graphic design! I'm lucky to have you as a resource. Sue
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment Amal. I was just speaking in general, but my mindset at the time was for college students. I would hope that my program would be useful to them because of its learner friendly design and the fact that I would be adjusting the course on the fly based on the feedback that I was receiving from my students.
ReplyDeleteHi Sue. I think I chose the learner centered model because this is the perspective that I am most familiar with. I know what I would like as a student and what I would benefit from. I believe that instruction should be tailored to best fit the students' needs and every group of students is different.
ReplyDeleteHi Nathaniel,
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing your idea for an online course using Foley’s basic principles of instructional design. It seems that you are prepared to give students a concise learning experience based on expected outcomes and validated by testing. I like the idea of giving students an option within modules to take different paths.
The idea of continuous feedback is a good idea as it can reiterate the student learning process and keep them on task by having clear due dates readily available.
By giving more than one path, how do you think it will affect the development process?